Upload Records Snowball Search Search OpenAlex
About the database ScholarIQanswers from OpenAlex
Trials
JournalCitation impact & published research
Trials is a journal indexed in ScholarIQ from OpenAlex. ScholarIQ records 12,308 works, 224,380 citations, an h-index of 133 and an APC (USD) of 2,390.
12,308
Works
224,380
Citations
133
h-index
2,390
APC (USD)
IDs:OpenAlex
What are the most-cited papers on Trials?
ScholarIQmost cited works
The COMET Handbook: version 1.0
Paula Williamson, Douglas G. Altman, Heather Bagley, Karen L. Barnes, Jane Blazeby, Sara Brookes, Mike Clarke, Elizabeth Gargon, Sarah L. Gorst, Nicola Harman, Jamie J Kirkham, Angus McNair, C.A.C. Prinsen, Jochen Schmitt, Caroline B. Terwee, Bridget Young
Trials. 20172,036 CitationsOPEN ACCESS
Assessing and reporting heterogeneity in treatment effects in clinical trials: a proposal
David M. Kent, Peter M. Rothwell, John P. A. Ioannidis, Doug Altman, Rodney A. Hayward
Trials. 2010509 CitationsOPEN ACCESS
Interventions to improve recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a survey and workshop to assess current practice and future priorities
Peter Bower, Valerie Brueton, Carrol Gamble, Shaun Treweek, Catrin Tudur Smith, Bridget Young, Paula Williamson
Trials. 2014401 CitationsOPEN ACCESS
Withdrawal of cerivastatin from the world market
Curt D. Furberg, Bertram Pitt
Trials. 2001399 CitationsOPEN ACCESS
Design, analysis, and presentation of crossover trials
Edward J. Mills, An‐Wen Chan, Ping Wu, Andy Vail, Gordon Guyatt, Douglas G. Altman
Trials. 2009327 CitationsOPEN ACCESS
Related on ScholarIQ
The COMET Handbook: version 1.0
Paper
Assessing and reporting heterogeneity in treatment effects in clinical trials: a proposal
Paper
Interventions to improve recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a survey and workshop to assess current practice and future priorities
Paper
Withdrawal of cerivastatin from the world market
Paper
Design, analysis, and presentation of crossover trials
Paper
The role of machine learning in clinical research: transforming the future of evidence generation
Paper